Background: To compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone intracervically in inducing labour. Materials & Methods: A total of 50 patients with an indication for induction of labor were randomly assigned. Labour induction was considered successful if participant delivered within 36 hours of initiation of misoprostol or dinoprostone. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The average time to delivery was notably shorter with misoprostol (1285) compared to dinoprostone (1501, P < 0.01). Conclusion: In inducing labor, intravaginal misoprostol proves to be a more efficient and cost-effective option than intracervical dinoprostone, while maintaining a comparable level of safety.