Background: Subjects with balance disorders are assessed using a series of vestibular function tests counting VNG (videonystagmography). However, performing the caloric test component of VNG is risky in subjects with ear infections. In such subjects, a closed-loop technique is utilized. Aim: The present study aimed to comparatively assess the efficacy of closed and open-loop techniques of caloric testing using videonystagmography in subjects with vertigo, and it was also applied to subjects with ear infections. Methods: The study assessed 166 subjects aged 20-60 who complained of giddiness utilizing videonystagmography with both open-loop and closed-loop methods. The data gathered were analyzed statistically for results formulation. Results: The study results showed that on comparison of outcomes of caloric responses in both the ears using the open-loop and closed-loop techniques, it was seen that the outcome was similar with both the techniques concerning the detection of the caloric response of the ear as there were no statistically significant differences in both the irrigation techniques. Conclusions: The present study concludes that the closed-loop irrigation technique has equal efficacy as the open-loop technique for the assessment of vertigo and can be used for the assessment of the vestibular system for subjects that are contraindicated for the use of the open-loop technique.